Levine v. March

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a statute of limitations may be tolled when a defendant engages in conduct intended to conceal an injury from the plaintiff
• stating that “legal claims based on champertous deeds are subject to dismissal”
• “[F]ailing to make an appropriate and timely objection to the admission of evidence in the trial court prevents a litigant from challenging the admission of the evidence on appeal.”
• stating in dicta that “the conservator of an absent or deceased party’s property stands in the shoes of the absent or deceased party and, therefore, may testify with regard to the value of the absent or deceased party’s property under Tenn. R. Evid. 701(b).”
• “[T]he majority of jurisdictions, including Tennessee, permit fact-finders to draw adverse inferences against parties who invoke their Fifth Amendment rights in civil case.”
• “Parties have the responsibility to see to it that the record contains the evidence necessary to support their arguments on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).