Levine v. Cassidy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Cases decided since [Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 26 (2006)] suggest that claims that would add assets to an estate, but do not reallocate those 27 assets among claimants or creditors, do not disturb a state probate court’s possession of 28 property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).