Levin v. Walter Kidde & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to require warning of the danger that a cracked syphon bottle might explode and holding \never use cracked bottle\ to be adequate as a matter of law
• declining to require warning of the danger that a cracked syphon bottle might explode and holding “never use cracked bottle” to be adequate as a matter of law
• where instructions told user how to use a syphon bottle, no liability for failure to warn of explosion in case of misuse
• “The duty owed is a reasonable warning”
• \The duty owed is a reasonable warning\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).