Skip to main content
· 12/27/1990

Levin v. Hindhaugh

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 839
  • 167 Ariz. 110
  • 76 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 90
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a compulsory 18 counterclaim must be asserted” to avoid claim preclusion, but to be compulsory, the claim “must 19 be mature”
  • “In Arizona, a compulsory counterclaim must be asserted against the plaintiff in order to avoid the application of the principle of res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Fernandez, Roll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.