Levin v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting more definite statement to providing “factual basis” by directing Hilchey “to supplement” paragraphs to allow defendants to determine “when the alleged misconduct took place, what it entailed and who was involved”
• requiring 17 The contested paragraphs are 68, 83 to 88, 213 to 225, 227 to 230, and 233 to 266. (D. 13, p. 14). Having stricken paragraphs 213 to 216, 219, 222 to 224, 225 (first sentence only
• Rule 12(e) motions address “not lack of detail” but “unintelligibility which” prevents “movant from ‘determining the issues he must meet’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).