Levin v. Bank of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that it is both disfavored and generally inappropriate to strike arguments or other portions of filings merely because they lack merit or \may suffer from a logical or factual defect\
• noting the need to discourage the tactical use of successive summary judgment motions
• “as recent Eleventh Circuit precedent confirms, a judicial determination of no duty to defend compels a finding of no duty to indemnify”
• “After all, as recent Eleventh Circuit precedent confirms, a judicial determination of no duty to defend compels a finding of no duty to indemnify.”
• “no federal litigant has an absolute right to bring multiple, piecemeal motions for summary judgment; rather, a successive Rule 56 motion may be filed only with the district court’s authorization”
• collecting cases that disapprove of multiple summary judgment motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).