Levi Strauss & Co. v. TOYO ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding factor satisfied where 24 trademark plaintiff alleged inability “to prevent continued infringement and dilution”
• finding factor satisfied where 26 trademark plaintiff alleged inability “to prevent continued infringement and dilution”
• finding this factor satisfied where trademark plaintiff alleged inability “to 19 prevent continued infringement and dilution”
• finding prejudice 8 absent a default judgment in a case where defendants failed to appear because plaintiff would be 9 unable to prevent continued infringement of its intellectual property rights
• finding \intentional act\ requirement satisfied by allegations of trademark infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).