Levey v. Graves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the disputed lease provision was “entered at arm’s length and, ultimately on terms . . . which were the residue of suggestions and countersuggestions on which each of the two sophisticated parties had attempted to persuade the other . . . ”
• If particularized meaning is intended, “surely no problem of draftsmanship would have stood in the way of its being spelled out.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).