Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a plaintiff’s “bizarre conspiracy theories” may warrant dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1)
• “the federal question averred may be plainly insubstantial [if it is] obviously without merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).