Levenson v. McCarty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the plaintiff made no attempt to contact the defendant by telephone or through his known attorneys, service by publication was improper
• explaining that Florida law “is consistent with the common law in permitting service by publication only where personal service cannot be made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).