Levence Simpson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Alleyne is not retroactive because Apprendi is not retroactive
• noting that Alleyne is an extension of the case law established by Apprendi, which the Supreme Court has not applied retroactively to cases on collateral appeal
• noting that Alleyne is an extension of the case law established by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 468, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 2351 (2000),11 which the Supreme Court has not applied retroactively to cases on collateral appeal
• noting that “Alleyne establishes a new rule of constitutional law”
• comparing Alleyne to the rule from Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), which has been held to be procedural
• comparing Alleyne to the rule from Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), which has been held to be procedural

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).