Skip to main content
· 6/12/2002

Leung v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP.

Citations

  • 213 F. Supp. 2d 1097
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10947
  • 2002 WL 1340303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Had Congress desired that section 1024(b)(4) provide for disclosure of outdated documents, it would have been easy to adopt statutory language to that effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.