Leuchtenmacher v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “a bad-faith claim might well be based on events subsequent to the filing of the suit on a policy and therefore could not be based on the ‘same’ facts”
• noting we generally don’t take judicial notice “without an agreement of the parties”
• motion to dismiss under rule 104(b) may hot be based on facts not alleged in the pleading attacked
• “[A] party must litigate all matters growing out of its claim at one time rather than in separate actions.”
• “[A] bad-faith claim might well be based on events subsequent to the filing of the suit on a policy and therefore could not be based on the ‘same’ facts.”
• “The issue here is whether an insured estate which has recovered in a suit against its own insurance company for uninsured motorist benefits is thereafter precluded from suing the company for its alleged bad-faith failure to 5 settle the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).