Letzler's Admr. v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “actions that the .Second Circuit has deemed sufficiently disadvantageous to constitute an adverse employment action have included a less distinguished titled, significantly diminished responsibilities, or other indices unique to a particular situation”
• denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs claim that the defendant’s refusal to reinstate her to a teaching position was an adverse employment action
• \Courts use the same definition for 'adverse employment actions' in discrimination cases brought under the ADA [and Title VII].\
• “Defendant clearly was aware of Plaintiff’s disability, and, thus, was under an obligation to engage in an interactive process regarding a reasonable accommodation.”
• the issue for interference claims “is simply whether the employer provided the employee with the entitlements set forth in the FMLA”
• “While CFEPA and the ADA are not identical, Connecticut courts apply the same standards to analyze CFEPA disability claims as are applied to ADA disability claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).