Lett v. Westland Development Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the [appraisal] remedy was intended to be exclusive” and therefore a dissenting shareholder “has no right at law or in equity to attack the validity of the corporate action”
• reviewing the history of the Atrisco land grant and the formation of Westland

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).