Skip to main content

Lett v. State

Citations

  • 164 Ga. App. 584
  • 298 S.E.2d 541
  • 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 3329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant in no way caused the delay where (i) defendant was unaware of an outstanding indictment due to his incarceration at the time it was returned; (ii) defendant did nothing to hinder any further prosecution or conceal himself; (iii
  • concluding that defendant in no way caused the delay where (i) defendant was unaware of an outstanding indictment due to his incarceration at the time it was returned; (ii) defendant did nothing to hinder any further prosecution or conceal himself; (iii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.