Skip to main content

Letson v. State

Citations

  • 512 S.E.2d 55
  • 236 Ga. App. 340
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 804
  • 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial counsel’s failure to call a witness cannot be deemed “prejudicial” without a showing that the witness’s testimony would have been relevant and favorable to the defendant
  • in assessing the prejudicial effect of an attorney’s failure to call a witness, the defendant bears the burden of showing how the failure affected the outcome of the case
  • no abuse of discretion in denying continuance because defendant failed to substantiate his claim that absent witness would have provided material testimony by failing to call that witness at motion for new trial hearing
  • no abuse of discretion in denying continuance because defendant failed to substantiate his claim that absent witness would have provided material testimony by failing to call that witness at motion for new trial hearing
  • defendant bears burden of establishing prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray, Blackburn, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.