Letson v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter an injunction, interpret section 47.01, and declare the plaintiff’s rights thereunder when plaintiff failed to implicate the unconstitutionality of section 47.01 pursuant to Morales
• stating “to the extent that the subject matter of [a] non-appealable interlocutory order may affect the validity of the appealable order, the non- appealable order may be considered”
• stating “to the extent that the subject matter of [a] non-appealable interlocutory order may affect the validity of the appealable order, the non- appealable order may be considered”
• \One cannot reasonably dispute that the ability to seize evidence of a crime is an integral part of enforcing this State's criminal laws.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).