Letner v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the policy fell within safe harbor regulation because the employer’s role was limited to the administrative task of implementing payroll deductions
• distinguishing between the simple sale of an insurance product and the existence of an ERISA plan, which must satisfy the definition in both form and substance
• a 15% discount obtained through employer was a de minimus and indirect contribution that did not constitute employer contribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).