Lethro v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 1983 claim not cognizable 19 because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive result in parole 20 hearing
• concluding that § 1983 claim not 8 cognizable because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive 9 result in parole hearing
• concluding that § 1983 claim not 15 cognizable because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive 16 result in parole hearing
• concluding that § 1983 claim not cognizable 4 because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive result in parole 5 hearing
• concluding that § 1983 claim not cognizable 22 because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive result in parole 23 hearing
• concluding that § 1983 claim not 6 || cognizable because allegations of procedural defects were an attempt to challenge substantive 7 || result in parole hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).