Skip to main content
· 11/14/1921

Lester v. Mills

Citations

  • 117 Wash. 502
  • 201 P. 752
  • 1921 Wash. LEXIS 870

Syllabus

<p>Arbitration and Award (16) — Conclusiveness—Evidence—Admissibility. Where an award has been made by arbitrators, the testimony of an arbitrator, in a subsequent action between the parties, is inadmissible for the purpose of varying the award with respect to an item which was a proper subject of the arbitration. ■</p>

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.