Lester v. Garrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “120-day time period” was “a reasonable time frame to confine the discretion granted by Section 17.54.130”
• concluding that “120—day time period” was “a reasonable time frame to confine the discretion granted by Section 17.54.130°
• holding that Reed does not alter the analysis for laws regulating off-site commercial speech
• noting that “onsite/offsite” distinctions are “content-neutral under the First Amendment’s 28, 2021
• holding Reed does not alter the analysis for laws regulating off-site commercial speech
• rejecting plaintiffs’ argument that Reed governed a regulation that banned commercial speech and applying intermediate scrutiny to that regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).