Skip to main content
· 7/9/1996

Lester Schmidt v. Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc.

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 342
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1340
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17065
  • 1996 WL 389253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[r]easonable accommodation does not require an employer to provide literally everything the disabled employee requests”
  • stating that “Reasonable accommodation does not require an employer to provide literally everything the disabled employee requests”
  • finding that the “accommodations [offered by the employer] may not have provided Schmidt everything that he wanted, but they are enough to satisfy Methodist’s statutory duty”
  • stating that \[r]easonable accommodation does not require an employer to provide literally everything the disabled employee requests\
  • stating that “[r]easonable accommodation does not require an employer to provide literally everything the disabled employee requests”
  • offering the opportunity to resign and reapply for employment in a different unit was a reasonable accommodation; employer was not obliged to offer a direct transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.