Skip to main content
· 10/23/1900

Lesser v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

Citations

  • 85 Mo. App. 326
  • 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the relevance, materiality, and admissibility of a witness's mental health records are within the sound discretion of the trial court
  • adopting a \procedure that effectuates the legislative mandates of section 44-22-100 of the South Carolina Code [2018] and the constitutional protections of the Confrontation Clause.\
  • discussing \a witness's state constitutional right to privacy\ relating to \confidential mental health records\ (footnote omitted)
  • upholding a death sentence as proportional where the defendant kidnapped and killed the daughter of his ex-wife's boyfriend
  • noting the novel issue before the Court was \whether a criminal defendant's constitutional right to confront a witness trumps a witness's state constitutional right to privacy and statutory privilege to maintain confidential mental health records\
  • noting the novel issue before the Court was \whether a criminal defendant's constitutional right to confront a witness trumps a witness's state constitutional right to privacy and statutory privilege to maintain confidential mental health records\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.