· 3/18/1861
Lessee of Smith v. McCann
Citations
- 65 U.S. 398
- 16 L. Ed. 714
- 24 How. 398
- 1860 U.S. LEXIS 417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that in a state maintaining distinct courts of law and equity, “the court of chancery ... has the exclusive jurisdiction of trusts and trust estates,” as it did in England
- indicating that in a state maintaining distinct courts of law and equity, “the court of chancery . . . has the exclusive jurisdiction of trusts and trust estates,” as it did in England
- indicating that in a state maintaining distinct courts of law and equity, “the court of chancery ... has the exclusive jurisdiction of trusts and trust estates,” as it did in England
- equitable restitution in cases of fraud
- equitable restitution in cases of fraud
- equitable restitution in cases of fraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.