Skip to main content
· 5/6/2014

Leslie Smith v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.

Citations

  • 750 F.3d 1253
  • 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 411
  • 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 721
  • 2014 WL 1775875
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8477
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district courts “have unquestionable authority to control their own dockets” and “decid[e] how best to manage the cases before them” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
  • noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
  • noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets[;] this authority includes ‘broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them’”
  • noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
  • noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Cox, Alarcón

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.