· 5/6/2014
Leslie Smith v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.
Citations
- 750 F.3d 1253
- 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 411
- 88 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 721
- 2014 WL 1775875
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8477
- 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that district courts “have unquestionable authority to control their own dockets” and “decid[e] how best to manage the cases before them” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
- noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
- noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets[;] this authority includes ‘broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them’”
- noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
- noting that district courts have “unquestionable authority to control their own dockets; this authority includes broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Cox, Alarcón
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.