Leslie D. Willis v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the role of the district court is not to afford a de novo review of the disciplinary board’s factual findings” or it “would assume the task of retrying all prison disciplinary disputes”
• requiring federal prisoners to administratively exhaust claims before seeking habeas relief
• “the role of the district court is not to afford a de novo review of disciplinary [action taken against an inmate; otherwise,] the federal court would assume the task of retrying all prison disciplinary disputes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).