Skip to main content
· 4/7/2016

Leslie Allen Schrecengost v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • revers- ing and remanding dismissal of § 2254 application asserting Fourth Amendment violation because district court failed to fully evaluate the petitioner’s argument that the rule of Stone did not bar his claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.