Leslie A. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FOODS CORPORATION, T/A Hanes DSD and L'Eggs, Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if drivers’ product had been removed from interstate commerce employer could have indiscriminately assigned driver interstate route
• noting that even if driver’s delivery not in .interstate commerce, employer could have assigned interstate route
• “[A]t any time, Consolidated could have reassigned interstate routes to Griffin.... We have held that where all the drivers are subject to the indiscriminate distribution of interstate service routes, the principle stated in Morris is controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).