Lesh v. Lesh
Citations
- 809 S.E.2d 890
Syllabus
Rule 60(b)(6) motion to set aside irregular judgment Rule 60(b)(4) equitable distribution order consideration of military disability benefits as income for distributive award Civil contempt order present ability to pay willful violation of order
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nothing in Howell alters the holding in Rose that military disability benefits are not required to be excluded from the definition of income for purposes of calculating the resources a party can draw upon to fulfill child support obligations.”
- “Nothing in Howell alters the holding in Rose that military disability benefits are not required to be excluded from the definition of income for the purposes of calculating the resources a party can draw upon to fulfill child support obligations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 626×
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 321×
- Howell v. HowellSupreme Court· 2017-05-15· cited 95×
- Spears v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-02-02· cited 23×
- Williams v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-11-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.