Skip to main content
· 5/19/2006

Lesesne v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 447 F.3d 828
  • 371 U.S. App. D.C. 53
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12242
  • 2006 WL 1359600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student’s substantive rights.”
  • \[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if th[e] procedural violations affected the student's substantive rights.\
  • plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the school district’s failure to satisfy mid-year IEP deadline was a substantive violation
  • “[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student’s substantive rights”
  • IDEA claim based on procedural error “is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student's substantive rights”
  • considering violation of “IDEA’s procedural deadlines” for evaluating the student

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.