· 5/19/2006
Lesesne v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 447 F.3d 828
- 371 U.S. App. D.C. 53
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12242
- 2006 WL 1359600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student’s substantive rights.”
- \[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if th[e] procedural violations affected the student's substantive rights.\
- plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the school district’s failure to satisfy mid-year IEP deadline was a substantive violation
- “[A]n IDEA claim is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student’s substantive rights”
- IDEA claim based on procedural error “is viable only if those procedural violations affected the student's substantive rights”
- considering violation of “IDEA’s procedural deadlines” for evaluating the student
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.