Les Brownlee, Acting Secretary of the Army v. Dyncorp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Allowing the aggrieved party to wait for a truly final judgment before appealing furthers the purposes of . . . the doctrine of finality.”
• “Allowing the aggrieved party to wait for a truly final judgment before appealing furthers the purposes of ... the doctrine of finality.”
• “Allowing the aggrieved party to wait ... furthers the purposes of both the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 ... and the doctrine of finality.”
• discussing the regulatory history of FAR § 31.205-47 generally and its application to criminal convictions of fraud specifically
• “The FAR regulations are the very type of regulations that the Supreme Court in Chevron and later cases has held should be afforded deference.”
• “The FAR regula- tions are the very type of regulations that the Supreme Court in Chevron and later cases has held should be afforded deference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).