Skip to main content
· 11/22/1994

Leroy F. Thomas, Jr. v. Howard University Hospital Howard University

Citations

  • 39 F.3d 370
  • 309 U.S. App. D.C. 93
  • 2 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 705
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33054
  • 1994 WL 652261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[l]iability for liquidated damages follows, unless the employer has a certain kind of excuse—a reasonable belief that its acts or omissions did not violate the law”
  • the district court was required to address arbitrability of the plaintiff’s claims as a threshold question prior to considering the plaintiff’s motion for class certification
  • “A court cannot evaluate the ‘reasonableness’ of an employer’s belief that its ‘act or omission was not a violation’ without first identifying the ‘act or omission.’ ”
  • “In most instances an employer will be able to satisfy [the FLSA’s] ‘reasonable grounds’ requirement only if it has relied on a reasonable, albeit erroneous, interpretation of the [statute] or of the regulations issued thereunder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Ginsburg, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.