Skip to main content
· 10/6/2014

Lerner v. Corbett

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 250
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 137
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3189
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parties’ stipulation to finding of neglect obviated the need for detailed findings indicating circumstances upon which finding of neglect was based
  • explaining that expert testimony was not required to support disposition order
  • \legislative scheme does not appear to hinge on permanency of abuse\ since \[t]he welfare of the child is the paramount concern\
  • “legislative scheme does not appear to hinge on permanency of abuse” since “[t]he welfare of the child is the paramount concern”
  • where parties stipulated to finding of neglect and “conclusion of law is based thereon in conformity with statutory purpose and procedure, the necessity for multiple findings, to bring out the circumstances upon which a finding is based, is obviated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.