Lerner Stores Corp. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving as methods for judging disparate impact, the four-fifths test and the statistical approach used by Madden
• approving as methods for judging disparate impact, the four-fifths test and the statistical approach used by Madden
• recognizing “null hypothesis” of no difference between compared groups
• referring to “expected result” and “obtained result” rather than “predicted result” and “actual result”
• describing statistical significance as “an alternative measure of differences between groups”
• “In the typical disparate impact case the proper population for analysis is the applicant pool or the eligible labor pool.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).