Skip to main content
· 11/3/1961

Lerer v. Arvida Realty Company

Citations

  • 134 So. 2d 798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prospective buyer not entitled to recover a deposit on theory of dual agency where real estate salesman not shown to have been subject to any orders or directions from the buyer/plaintiff nor to have been paid any fee by the buyer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.