Lepre v. Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an award is presumed valid” and must be confirmed so long as there is a “barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.”
• holding that “an award is presumed valid” and must be confirmed so long as there is a “barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.”
• stating that “an extremely deferential standard of review” is appropriate “to encourage and support the use of arbitration by consenting parties”
• requiring only a “barely colorable justification for the outcome reached” (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining the relevant inquiry is not whether “the arbitrators correctly decided [an] issue.”
• explaining the relevant inquiry is not whether “the arbitrators correctly decided [an] issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).