Skip to main content

Lepper v. State

Citations

  • 826 So. 2d 363
  • 2002 WL 946267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts occasionally treat untimely filed motions to withdraw filed under Rule 3.170( l ) as if they were proper postconviction motions
  • explaining that a trial court has no authority to consider a motion to withdraw pursuant to Rule 3.170( l ) that is filed outside of the 30-day window

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whatley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.