LePore v. Norwest Bank Indiana, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, when there is not “a complete lack of compliance with T.R. 4.1(B)” and there is proof of “substantial compliance,” service may be sufficient pursuant to Rule 4.15(F)
• finding, under Rule 4.15(F), that service was reasonably calculated to inform the defendant of the action where the defendant had received a copy of the summons and complaint when the sheriff left the documents at his residence in compliance with Indiana Rule 4.1(A)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).