Skip to main content
· 1/26/1995

Lepere v. United Public Workers, Local 646

Citations

  • 887 P.2d 1029
  • 77 Haw. 471
  • 1995 Haw. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the vast majority of courts tend to hold pro se litigants to a lower standard of accountability than attorneys (citations, internal quotation marks, and original brackets omitted)
  • holding that the trial court is under no obligation to sua sponte find a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 11(b) violation where a party has not moved for sanctions
  • holding pro se appellant had a duty to include relevant transcripts as part of record on appeal
  • holding pro se appellant had a duty to include relevant transcripts as part of record on appeal
  • appellant has duty to include relevant transcripts of proceedings as part of record on appeal
  • “Lepere, as appellant, had a duty to include the relevant transcripts of proceedings as a part of the record on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Milks, Klein, Nakatani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.