Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “courts must look to the monopolist’s conduct taken as a whole rather than considering each aspect in isolation”
• “The relevant inquiry is the anticompetitive effect of 3M’s exclusionary practices considered together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).