Lepage's 2000, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Commission's order departed from a prior order because it changed the focus of its analysis and considered new factors
• remanding to allow the Commission to explain the “inconsistencies in its order”
• remanding to allow the Commission to explain the “inconsistencies in its order”
• “[W]e, of course, cannot uphold a decision where an agency departs from established precedent without a reasoned explanation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).