Leopoldo Flores v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is “impermissible” to “attempt to prove imprudence by hindsight”
• “[P]laintiffs’ desire to avoid seeking leave to amend more than once does not excuse their belated assertion of the claims they knew about [earlier].”
• “[P]laintiffs’ desire to avoid seeking leave to amend more than once does not excuse their belated assertion of the claims they knew about [earlier].”
• “Under State Street’s -24- agreement with the Plan, State Street was allowed to retain the income earned from float. Absent this agreement, any float income would have been property of the Plan.”
• “[D]elay alone is not a reason to deny a proposed amend- ment, and that delay must be coupled with some other rea- son, such as prejudice to the defendants.”
• “Plaintiffs point out that delay alone is not a reason to deny a proposed amendment, and that delay must be coupled with some other reason, such as prejudice to the defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).