Skip to main content
· 7/27/1988

Leong v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Citations

  • 689 F. Supp. 1572
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 988
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7771
  • 1988 WL 78981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “merely articulat[ing] disagreement with [a] court's 1 analysis in its prior order” is not an appropriate reason to file a motion for reconsideration
  • mere 3 || disagreement with a previous order is an insufficient basis for reconsideration
  • mere disagreement with a previous order is an 1 || insufficient basis for reconsideration
  • “a party must show that there has been intervening development in the law, some new evidence not previously available, or that the prior order is in clear error or would operate to create a manifest injustice”
  • mere disagreement with 3 a previous order is an insufficient basis for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.