Supreme Court of Georgia· 10/5/1998
Leonard v. State
Citations
- 506 S.E.2d 853
- 269 Ga. 867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an expert may be examined about the hearsay upon which his opinion rests in order to allow the trier of fact to evaluate the opinion
- testifying expert not to serve as conduit for opinions of others
- expert may give opinion based on his own examination or observation or “upon any state of facts, supported by some evidence in the case, which he assumes as true”
- “The evidence suggests no occasion for [Wright] to have left his fingerprints there except during the crime, and the evidence authorized the jury to conclude that every reasonable hypothesis was excluded except [his] guilt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-05-17· cited 47×
- Bagwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-10-26· cited 44×
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-03-17· cited 41×
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-11-05· cited 40×
- Columbus v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-15· cited 35×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-07· cited 18×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16· cited 16×
- O'Connell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-01-21· cited 15×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 13×
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-02-22· cited 12×
- In the Interest of H. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-09-14· cited 12×
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-07-15· cited 10×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-08-14· cited 9×
- FORD v. TATE (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-31· cited 9×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-16· cited 4×
- Webb v. Thomas Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-06-04· cited 3×
- James Kershaw v. Princeton Properties Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-25· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-07-16· cited 3×
- Crowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-02-06· cited 2×
- Cornell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-14· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Sabel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-06-30· cited 121×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1966-01-07· cited 74×
- Rower v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-06-06· cited 72×
- White v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-07-15· cited 57×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-25· cited 54×
- DeKalb County v. Trustees, Decatur Lodge No. 1602Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-11-22· cited 48×
- King v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-17· cited 43×
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-02-12· cited 42×
- Doctors Hospital of Augusta, Inc. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-03-15· cited 36×
- Lyon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-05-28· cited 19×
- Loper v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-12-03· cited 19×
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-09-28· cited 15×
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-09-22· cited 13×
- Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-01-19· cited 9×
- McEver v. Worrell EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-11-20· cited 7×
- Roberts v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-11-20· cited 6×
- Stephens v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-05-09· cited 4×
- Kier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-03-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.