Leonard v. Cook & Pruitt Masonry, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the question of whether the claimant was self-employed after becoming separated from an employer and, therefore, ineligible for benefits under section 402(h
• claimant who provided telephone consultation services to clients of putative employer was not self- employed
• “[T]he fact that an unemployed person . . . accept[s] an occasional offer of work is simply not enough to demonstrate that said individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).