Leonard v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting recommendation to affirm Commissioner’s decision where ALJ failed to acknowledge apparent conflict between VE testimony that plaintiff could perform work with reasoning level three and RFC limitation to simple, routine, and repetitive tasks
• rejecting a recommendation to affirm a Commissioner’s decision where the ALJ failed to acknowledge an apparent conflict between the VE’s testimony that plaintiff could perform work with reasoning level three and an RFC limitation to simple, routine, and repetitive tasks
• “Courts have recognized three grounds upon which a party may obtain reconsideration of a court order or judgment: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; and (3) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).