Leonard T. Sutton v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the Board’s finding that the appellant did not receive an RO decision despite the lack of any analysis or evidence rebutting the presumption of regularity
• accepting the Board's finding that the appellant did not receive an RO decision despite the lack of any analysis or evidence rebutting the presumption of regularity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).