Leonard Rogers v. Neil J. Bruntrager, Janet Fanetti, Brendan Ryan, Charles D. Kitchin, Philip Kramer, James L. Sanders, Henry Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that clerks of court are immune from damages arising from acts they are \ specifically required to do under court order at a judge's direction\
• holding that clerks of court are immune from damages arising from acts they are \specifically required to do under court order at a judge’s direction\
• noting that application of res judicata principles after § 1915(d) dismissal can be \somewhat problematical\
• noting that application of res judicata principles after § 1915(d) dismissal can be “somewhat problematical”
• explaining that clerks of court “have absolute immunity from actions for damages arising from acts they are specifically required to do under court order or at a judge’s direction.”
• stating clerks of court are immune from actions arising out of acts they were required to perform under court order or at a judge’s direction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).