Leonard R. Milstein v. Stephen L. Cooley Robert B. Foltz Countyof Los Angeles, Opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing a crime report is not the function of an advocate and does not confer absolute immunity
• recognizing that Congress did not waive sovereign immunity when enacting 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• stating that “[i]ntent should play no role” in the prosecutorial immunity analysis (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “acquiring known false statements from a witness for use in a prosecution is ... fabricating evidence that is unprotected by absolute immunity”
• \acquiring known false statements from a witness for use in a prosecution is ... fabricating evidence that is unprotected by absolute immunity\
• “acquiring known false statements from a witness for use in a prosecution is ... fabricating evidence that is unprotected by absolute immunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).